<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>The Online Society</title> <atom:link href="http://theonlinesociety.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://theonlinesociety.com</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:30:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>Tory MP</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/tory-mp/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/tory-mp/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:30:56 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Douglas Carswell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Euro]]></category> <category><![CDATA[France]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Francois Hollande]]></category> <category><![CDATA[French]]></category> <category><![CDATA[French Presidential Election]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hollande]]></category> <category><![CDATA[London]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Merkozy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Nicholas Sarkozy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sarkozy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tax]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1507</guid> <description><![CDATA[Douglas Carswell A French presidential election is due in a couple of weeks. Should one care? Will the outcome change anything? Not, I suspect, if incumbent Nicolas Sarkozy wins. We&#8217;ll have more Euro summitry and muppetry.  More bailout and borrow economics. More talk of reform, without much change.  Not to mention, more of the Love Actuallywith<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/tory-mp/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/tory-mp/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Lessons on Liberalisation from Germany</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/lessons-on-liberalisation-from-germany/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/lessons-on-liberalisation-from-germany/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:31:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[budget]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Douglas Carswell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[emplo]]></category> <category><![CDATA[employment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[employment tribunal]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1497</guid> <description><![CDATA[Douglas Carswell From last week, you’ll need to have worked for someone else for two years, rather than just one, before you can drag them to an employment tribunal for unfair dismissal. Good. Those who use their energy, effort and capital to create wealth – and work – should not be tied down by tribunals.  Quite apart<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/lessons-on-liberalisation-from-germany/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/lessons-on-liberalisation-from-germany/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>What Children&#8217;s Names Reveal&#8230;</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/what-childrens-names-reveal/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/what-childrens-names-reveal/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Society]]></category> <category><![CDATA[babies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[children]]></category> <category><![CDATA[education]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Frank Chalk]]></category> <category><![CDATA[names]]></category> <category><![CDATA[naming]]></category> <category><![CDATA[teachers]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1494</guid> <description><![CDATA[Frank Chalk A poll of 3000 teachers run by the parenting club website bounty.com revealed that roughly half of teachers make assumptions about children based upon their first names. Their judgements are shown below and are pretty accurate. Naughty Boys                                Naughty Girls<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/what-childrens-names-reveal/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/what-childrens-names-reveal/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Why the Boat Race Revolutionary Won&#8217;t Go Directly To Jail</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/why-the-boat-race-revolutionary-wont-go-directly-to-jail/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/why-the-boat-race-revolutionary-wont-go-directly-to-jail/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:00:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Boat race]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bystander]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cambridge]]></category> <category><![CDATA[law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Oxford]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Public Order Act]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1500</guid> <description><![CDATA[Bystander I haven&#8217;t heard whether the smugly grinning fun-revolutionary who was arrested for wrecking the Boat Race has been charged with an offence. On the face of it, a Public Order Act Section 4 might be a runner (he has  cheerfully admitted planning and the intention of causing harassment alarm and distress). If he is<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/why-the-boat-race-revolutionary-wont-go-directly-to-jail/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/why-the-boat-race-revolutionary-wont-go-directly-to-jail/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Two Perspectives on the Marriage Debate</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/two-perspectives-on-the-marriage-debate/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/two-perspectives-on-the-marriage-debate/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 09:30:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Society]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Church]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Church of England]]></category> <category><![CDATA[civil partnerships]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lord Carey]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lynne Featherstone]]></category> <category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category> <category><![CDATA[religion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[the telegraph]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tim Worstall]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1491</guid> <description><![CDATA[Lynne Featherstone: It’s an interesting question and a pressing one in the debate around equal civil marriage. It is owned by neither the state nor the church, as the former Archbishop Lord Carey rightly said. So it is owned by the people. The fierce debate over the past few weeks has shown people feel very<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/two-perspectives-on-the-marriage-debate/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/two-perspectives-on-the-marriage-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>On the Guardian&#8217;s Economic Illiteracy</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/on-the-guardians-economic-illiteracy/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/on-the-guardians-economic-illiteracy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 09:30:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Aditya Chakrabotty]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Alan Rusbridger]]></category> <category><![CDATA[banks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ECB]]></category> <category><![CDATA[economics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[EFSF]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Eoin Clarke]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Eurozone crisis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IMF]]></category> <category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Socialist Worker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tim Worstall]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1486</guid> <description><![CDATA[Tim Worstall This is absurd! So the bankers whose excesses helped land Europe in this mess then get to sit round the big EU table, like any other government, and decide who should pay for it. And the answer, unsurprisingly, is: not them. The bigger question is: why finance has been granted such power? This<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/on-the-guardians-economic-illiteracy/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/on-the-guardians-economic-illiteracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Only Direct Democracy Can Restore Faith in Politics</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/only-direct-democracy-can-restore-faith-in-politics/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/only-direct-democracy-can-restore-faith-in-politics/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:31:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Caroline Dinenage]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Conservative Party]]></category> <category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[direct democracy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Douglas Carswell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gosport]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Great Repeal Bill]]></category> <category><![CDATA[left]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Open primary]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Party funding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Police Commissioners]]></category> <category><![CDATA[right]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sarah Wollaston]]></category> <category><![CDATA[taxpayers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Coalition]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Totnes]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1484</guid> <description><![CDATA[Douglas Carswell A few years ago, we Conservatives were feeling our way towards a new open politics agenda. First we allowed every Londoner &#8211; regardless of any party affiliation &#8211; to have a say over who should be our candidate as mayor.  Boris won that first primary contest and went on to win the election that followed.  He has remained consistently more popular in London<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/only-direct-democracy-can-restore-faith-in-politics/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/only-direct-democracy-can-restore-faith-in-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Failing Justice System, Failing Society</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/failing-justice-system-failing-society/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/failing-justice-system-failing-society/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:30:04 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CPS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[crime]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lex Ferenda]]></category> <category><![CDATA[police]]></category> <category><![CDATA[policing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Punishment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category> <category><![CDATA[young people]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1479</guid> <description><![CDATA[Lex Ferenda Over the last 50 years or so we have become victims of an experiment by liberal policy makers, exacerbated more lately by our attachment to Europe and the Human Rights Act. These naive policies, which have supposedly given individuals more freedoms, have in fact resulted in the majority having their freedoms eroded. In the case of crime, the<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/failing-justice-system-failing-society/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/failing-justice-system-failing-society/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Tories Embrace Party Funding Cap</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/tories-embrace-party-funding-cap/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/tories-embrace-party-funding-cap/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:30:57 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[April]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Conservative Party]]></category> <category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ed Milliband]]></category> <category><![CDATA[George Osborne]]></category> <category><![CDATA[James Manwaring]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Party funding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Peter Cruddas]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1475</guid> <description><![CDATA[In a dramatic 3-point turn last night, David Cameron confirmed that the Conservative Party will set a £1000 cap on the size of party donations by individuals. &#160; In the wake of the devastating revelations by Peter Cruddas the Conservative Party has lurched through the Kübler-Ross model in record time. Attempting to draw a circle<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/tories-embrace-party-funding-cap/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/04/tories-embrace-party-funding-cap/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Financial Transactions Tax vs. Logic</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/the-financial-transactions-tax-vs-logic/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/the-financial-transactions-tax-vs-logic/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:30:09 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CDOs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CDS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[commercial property]]></category> <category><![CDATA[derivatives]]></category> <category><![CDATA[economics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[economy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Financial Transactions Tax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[FSA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[FTT]]></category> <category><![CDATA[futures]]></category> <category><![CDATA[FX]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Granite bonds]]></category> <category><![CDATA[HBOS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lloyds]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Northern Rock]]></category> <category><![CDATA[options]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The City]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tim Worstall]]></category> <category><![CDATA[trading]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1471</guid> <description><![CDATA[Tim Worstall So, we’ve got the FSA report into why HBOS fell over. Fascinating stuff really. For there’s not a derivative, toxic or not, in there. There’s not even trading problems. It was a simple, classic, over-extension of credit to the property sector. It’s happened before, no doubt it will happen again. But do note that: it’s nothing<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/the-financial-transactions-tax-vs-logic/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/the-financial-transactions-tax-vs-logic/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Perils of the Paperless Courts</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/the-perils-of-the-paperless-courts/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/the-perils-of-the-paperless-courts/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:30:47 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bystander]]></category> <category><![CDATA[court]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CPS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IT]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Paperless system]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1468</guid> <description><![CDATA[Bystander &#160; The CPS are shortly to begin their new &#8216;paperless as far as the door of the court&#8217; document handling system. I wish them well and hope that the widely expressed fear that this will be just another Government IT fiasco proves to be groundless. The gossip grapevine tells me that local solicitors are<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/the-perils-of-the-paperless-courts/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/the-perils-of-the-paperless-courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The EU&#8217;s Self Destruct Button?</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/the-eus-self-destruct-button/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/the-eus-self-destruct-button/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:30:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[EU]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Euroscepticism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Financial Transactions Tax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[FTT]]></category> <category><![CDATA[idiocy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tim Worstall]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1466</guid> <description><![CDATA[Tim Worstall In a move that has astounded British MEPs, Jose Manuel Barroso, president of the EC, announced that the levy could halve European Union members’ contributions. Mr Barroso has proposed that countries keep a third of the proceeds of the levy themselves and give two-thirds of it to Brussels. Europe’s budget would become “self<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/the-eus-self-destruct-button/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/the-eus-self-destruct-button/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Apple: Tax Dodger Extraordinaire</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/apple-tax-dodger-extraordinaire/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/apple-tax-dodger-extraordinaire/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:30:57 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category> <category><![CDATA[corporation tax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[economics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[John Tyler]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tax havens]]></category> <category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[technology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[US]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1460</guid> <description><![CDATA[John Tyler Apple is clearly no friend of the USA. This behemoth of technology, which unveiled its first shareholder dividend in 17 years last week, has amassed a $100 billion treasure chest from a string of hit products.  Some $64 billion of this amazing pile of gold is kept from the IRS of the USA<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/apple-tax-dodger-extraordinaire/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/apple-tax-dodger-extraordinaire/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Party Funding: 4 Key Points</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/party-funding-4-key-points/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/party-funding-4-key-points/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:30:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Douglas Carswell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Party funding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tory donors]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Whitehall]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1463</guid> <description><![CDATA[Douglas Carswell Some thoughts on political donations: 1. No more taxpayer funded politics If political parties have got things wrong, then it is they that need to change. Recent headlines cannot be an excuse to get the taxpayer to pay for party politics. Parties might like to try to live within their means and raise<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/party-funding-4-key-points/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/party-funding-4-key-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>What is the Rule of Law? (Complete)</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/rule-of-law-complete/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/rule-of-law-complete/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:00:36 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Application Standards]]></category> <category><![CDATA[equality]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hayek]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Inner Standards]]></category> <category><![CDATA[James Manwaring]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rule of Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[the Rule of Good Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Rule of Law as a Spectrum]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Rule of Law as a Timetable]]></category> <category><![CDATA[UN]]></category> <category><![CDATA[What is...]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1411</guid> <description><![CDATA[James Manwaring This is the complete series of articles which detailed the basic idea behind the Rule of Law, and proposed the idea of a &#8216;timetable&#8217; to explain the different components of the concept.  &#160; What is… the Rule of Law? &#160; It’s a phrase you probably hear all the time. Used and abused consistently,<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/rule-of-law-complete/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/rule-of-law-complete/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>What is the Rule of Law? (5/5)</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/rule-of-law-5/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/rule-of-law-5/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:00:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[James Manwaring]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rule of Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Rule of Law as a Spectrum]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Rule of Law as a Timetable]]></category> <category><![CDATA[What is...]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1405</guid> <description><![CDATA[James Manwaring This is the fifth and final part of a 5 part series which details the basic idea behind the Rule of Law, and proposes the idea of a &#8216;timetable&#8217; to explain the different components of the concept. Click for parts 1, 2, 3 and 4. &#160; The Rule of Law as  a Spectrum<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/rule-of-law-5/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/03/rule-of-law-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>What is the Rule of Law? (4/5)</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/rule-of-law-4/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/rule-of-law-4/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:00:32 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Buses]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hayek]]></category> <category><![CDATA[James Manwaring]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rule of Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[the Rule of Good Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Rule of Law as a Timetable]]></category> <category><![CDATA[UN]]></category> <category><![CDATA[What is...]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1402</guid> <description><![CDATA[James Manwaring This is the fourth part of a 5 part series which details the basic idea behind the Rule of Law, and proposes the idea of a &#8216;timetable&#8217; to explain the different components of the concept. Click for parts 1, 2 and 3. &#160; The Rule of Good Law? &#160; The previous section brings up<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/rule-of-law-4/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/rule-of-law-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>What is the Rule of Law?  (3/5)</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/rule-of-law-3/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/rule-of-law-3/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:00:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Application Standards]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Buses]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category> <category><![CDATA[James Manwaring]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rule of Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Rule of Law as a Timetable]]></category> <category><![CDATA[UN]]></category> <category><![CDATA[What is...]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1394</guid> <description><![CDATA[James Manwaring This is the third part of a 5 part series which details the basic idea behind the Rule of Law, and proposes the idea of a &#8216;timetable&#8217; to explain the different components of the concept. Click for parts 1 and 2. &#160; AWOL Bus Drivers and Application Standards &#160; So what happens if<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/rule-of-law-3/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/rule-of-law-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The University Access Tsar</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/the-university-access-tsar/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/the-university-access-tsar/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:30:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Douglas Carswell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Les Ebdon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Michael Gove]]></category> <category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category> <category><![CDATA[University Access Tsar]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1445</guid> <description><![CDATA[Douglas Carswell Les Ebdon has been appointed as the new university access tsar.  I wish him well and bear him no ill will. But whatever you think about Prof Ebdon&#8217;s suitability for this role, it is what this appointment tells us about the government’s attitude towards political reform, not universities, that I find so disappointing. Prof Ebdon<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/the-university-access-tsar/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/the-university-access-tsar/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Mutualisation Isn’t the Answer</title><link>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/mutualisation-isnt-the-answer/</link> <comments>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/mutualisation-isnt-the-answer/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:30:38 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Online Society</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[banks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Caja Castilla La Mancha]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Caja de Ahorros del Mediterráneo]]></category> <category><![CDATA[housing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[housing crisis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mututalisation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tim Worstall]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinesociety.com/?p=1434</guid> <description><![CDATA[Tim Worstall Having mutuals in the banking system might be a good idea for all sorts of reasons. But not perhaps for the reason that so many here claim. Which is, of course, that mutuals wouldn’t have gone so gung ho into excessive housing finance and thus wouldn’t have pumped up the bubble that led<a
href="http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/mutualisation-isnt-the-answer/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://theonlinesociety.com/2012/02/mutualisation-isnt-the-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
